Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc
So has everything else. That's my point. You are painting all of wikipedia as false which simply isn't true.
|
I said it was an unrealiable source. I didn't say every single page there is bogus.
Its like I wouldn't go to some of my fundamentalist relatives to find out about evolution.
Say if I wanted to look up star formation, Wikipedia might have good info. But I wouldn't go there for anything that might be a political hot potato.
I have read of a number of universities that refuse to accept it as a resource for a term paper. So, I'm not the only one who sees it as unreliable.