Thread: Scholarly publications better in electronic form
View Single Post
Old 11-09-2007, 01:31 PM   #27
kovidgoyal
creator of calibre
kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kovidgoyal's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,197
Karma: 29626604
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Anonymous review is absolutely vital for scientific journals. It's the whole basis of the system by which journal article are impartially reviewed.
I've often thought that article review should be doubly anonymous. i.e. when they are sent to the referee author information should be removed. I've never understood why that's not done.
Last edited by kovidgoyal; 11-09-2007 at 01:33 PM.
kovidgoyal is offline   Reply With Quote