View Single Post
Old 11-09-2007, 01:25 PM   #25
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
You're right, because otherwise the reviewers have no idea which papers to review. Except in the cases noted above, when papers have been presented at a conference. I don't think this is incompatible with the kind of review system I was describing, but it is an additional requirement of the overall system of disseminating scholarly work.
Anonymous review is absolutely vital for scientific journals. It's the whole basis of the system by which journal article are impartially reviewed.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote