View Single Post
Old 11-09-2007, 09:41 AM   #23
nekokami
fruminous edugeek
nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nekokami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,745
Karma: 551260
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northeast US
Device: iPad, eBw 1150
Quote:
Originally Posted by kovidgoyal View Post
I still feel that some sort of non profit organization that does the matching of papers with anonymous referees and hosts electronic copies in perpetuity is the ideal solution.
You're right, because otherwise the reviewers have no idea which papers to review. Except in the cases noted above, when papers have been presented at a conference. I don't think this is incompatible with the kind of review system I was describing, but it is an additional requirement of the overall system of disseminating scholarly work.
nekokami is offline   Reply With Quote