Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck
They are welcome to consider it a "license for use" instead of a sale--if they describe it that way before purchase, set the terms of the license in accord with the laws that define licenses, and pay authors for licensed content instead of sales.
|
Let me guess how people here would react if they tried that.
I suspect this will all follow the music model eventually. But I don't think you'll ever see them explicitly allowing resale when resale effectively means "selling a clone." Do you see the music industry saying, "Sure, you can resell these MP3s when you're done with them"?