View Single Post
Old 09-29-2010, 11:13 PM   #29
markbot
Guru
markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.markbot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
markbot's Avatar
 
Posts: 612
Karma: 7511929
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York, NY
Device: Amazon Kindle Paperwhite 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Minneman View Post
The OP had the subject as "What should the top income tax rate be?", so obviously in a perfect world, 0% of income would be taxed.

All taxation should be consumption based, with exceptions for essentials (food, utilities, housing, transportation, education, and healthcare).

Taxing based on "non-essentials" purchasing evens the playing field and is more "fair", as a person making 20k won't be taxed like a person making 2,000,000... This method would also end up taxing a lot of various criminal enterprises, where currently most criminal income is tax free anyway, a consumption based tax would certainly even that out as well.
theoretically, economists say the best tax would be fixed and levied at the beginning of your life...assuming they knew your earnings power. consumption based taxes are actually among the worse types of taxes because they distort buying and selling decisions the most....creating a wedge between buyers and sellers.

fixed taxes are less distortive (think property taxes)

Last edited by markbot; 09-29-2010 at 11:32 PM.
markbot is offline   Reply With Quote