View Single Post
Old 11-08-2004, 12:08 PM   #4
Alexander Turcic
Fully Converged
Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Alexander Turcic's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,175
Karma: 14021202
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Switzerland
Device: Too many to count here.
I agree with you, stareja. It is the right of every ISP to remove improper content (as definied in the TOS) and to disable the person's account who is responsible for the improper content. The difference here may be that ISPs normally only act in removing files upon external request.

How does Google (or better, as you said it, its computer bot) know that the content was indeed "inproper"? Just by a mere judging of the filenames? It is impossible for the bot to know for sure, unless Google invented the first AI. "No human reads your email to target ads or related information to you without your consent." - in other words, some real person must have decided that the content uploaded was improper, and henceforth the Gmail account holder should have been notified beforehand.
Alexander Turcic is offline   Reply With Quote