View Single Post
Old 09-28-2010, 04:51 AM   #53
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Interesting enough, last week my local astronomical society had a talk from Dr. Guy Consolmagno, who is also a Jesuit priest, and works at the Vatican Observatory. The subject of the supposed conflict between science and religion naturally arose, and he said that, certainly from his perspective, there's no conflict at all, and the Catholic Church, at any rate, fully accepts such ideas as the Big Bang, the universe being 13.7 billion years old, evolution, etc. etc. The Vatican has a science advisory council (of which Stephen Hawking is a member) specifically to advice it on new developments in science.
They usually then end up with a "God in the gap" theory and that is usually not what the common man associate with the God concept.

Also I think it is a conflict in the ways you decide to hold things true. For religion (Catholicism) you can hold thing true using methods that you would not accept in your activity as a scientist. To me this has always been the big conflict. How to motivate the difference in standard.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote