View Single Post
Old 09-26-2010, 03:55 PM   #12022
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
But that's exactly the point. If the Publisher (for whom Amazon is acting as an agent) has a presence in the state then they can charge sales tax.
What presence might the publisher have? As mentioned, the fact that books they publish might be sold there isn't likely to qualify.

If they have an actual brick and mortar operation (like a warehouse/distribution center,) it probably does qualify.

But so what? As I said, it's not like the retailer or the publisher want to charge taxes. They don't see a benefit from it. They'll be just as happy not to, so I can't really point the finger of blame at them.

The state wants to charge the taxes, and the local tax codes let them do so in a particular case.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote