View Single Post
Old 09-26-2010, 02:06 PM   #12008
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
Maybe, but I'm leaning towards the publisher conspiracy theory meaning that since the book is only being Agented by Amazon and if the Publisher has a presence in Colorado then it is taxable....
I doubt it. What sort of presence would the publisher have in CO? Simply having books they published sold there doesn't qualify.

And Amazon as Agent and publisher presence aren't meaningful as a conspiracy. They don't benefit from the move. The state does. I'm quite certain Amazon would be just as happy to not charge tax, to save themselves the headache of keeping track of whether they had to in any particular location, just what tax they had to charge, and where they had to remit what they collected. Likewise, the publisher will be happy at anything that doesn't add to the cost the buyer pays. They have no incentive to like taxes. It's just something they're stuck with.

Quote:
Either that or the laws just changed....
Or are just now being enforced.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote