Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Strnad
Nobody need to reimburse the OP for his misinvested $120. Telling him what is morally correct does not entail the burden of ameliorating his loss. That would be charity, which is optional by definition. No one has any moral responsibility to make the OP financially whole again.
|
Do you mean "follow the law" by "morraly correct"?
Otherwise you should not that other countries have implemented things differently. One way ti implement the laws is that if you buy something and had no reason to suspect it was stolen (good faith) then you own it even if it was stolen. So there are no was you can say that one way is the morally correct one.