View Single Post
Old 09-26-2010, 02:11 AM   #192
nguirado
Wizard
nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,262
Karma: 1499080
Join Date: May 2010
Device: Nook
I don't want the thread to degenerate, but it's not a lie that liberals mock people with whom they disagree regularly. Listen to liberals talk about Tea Party (the disgusting epitaph "teabaggers") people, Sarah Palin, religious conservatives (here, this trumps poverty). There's something else going on besides disagreement. Listen to Bill Maher, Olbermann, Stewart, Howard Dean, Frank Rich, etc.

Quote:
None of this is true, some of it is blind bigotry, and all of it is fed into their minds by the lobbyists of the top 2% via AM radio and corporate News channels.
This is kind of what I'm talking about. Many liberals equate conservatism with bigotry or naked self-interest (as opposed to the magnanimous trial lawyers). Is that nice? Is that very respectful? Does that demonstrate a knowledge of conservative thought? I acknowledged (and do so every single time) that differences between the Texas board supporters and the California board supporters are sincere and have to do with different starting points. Do liberals usually say that conservatives also want the best for society?

Last edited by nguirado; 09-26-2010 at 02:37 AM.
nguirado is offline   Reply With Quote