View Single Post
Old 09-25-2010, 03:57 PM   #19
Worldwalker
Curmudgeon
Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Worldwalker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,085
Karma: 722357
Join Date: Feb 2010
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger the rabbit View Post
What about some way of being able to give negative Karma!
(say a fixed percentage of what the offending poster has).

Then when their K gets below a certain figure or (%age of what they had or %reduction) they can't post for a week, 10 days, or something.

Or will this lead to vigilante (ism) or too complicated.

(Just an idea)
Bad idea. When someone posts a perfectly legal but unpopular idea, they'll get de-karmaed by everyone who disagrees with them. Take the argument I was having with some of the OTW followers regarding the "proper" role of men and women in fanfic. They disagreed with me, strongly (of course, I was right). You think my karma wouldn't have been a smoking crater if they could have done that? And that's just over whether sorting people by sex is a good idea or not. Imagine what would have happened if I'd been defending an unpopular religious viewpoint.

It's not popular speech that needs protection. MR doesn't need to empower mobs.
Worldwalker is offline