Thread: Steampunk?
View Single Post
Old 09-22-2010, 10:02 AM   #31
bill_mchale
Wizard
bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
Dennis, I think you will find that in most cases genres emerge slowly over time. The earliest writers (or artists for other works like music), don't necessarily see themselves as inventing a new genre. Works are then classified into that genre after it is finally recognized as existing.

HG Wells and Jules Verne did not think of their works as being Science Fiction in the same sense that we would today, but they surely are. Nor did E.E. "Doc" Smith think of his Lensman series as being the prototype for Space Opera. The Sword and Sorcery sub-genre was not even given its name until 25 years after its most famous and influential author (Robert E. Howard) was dead; I doubt however that anyone is going to claim that Conan the Barbarian is not a Sword and Sorcery character.

Since I consider Steam Punk that does not involve magic to be a subset of Alternate History, I definitely consider Harrison's book to be Steampunk.

--
Bill
bill_mchale is offline   Reply With Quote