View Single Post
Old 09-21-2010, 10:48 AM   #13
theducks
Well trained by Cats
theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
theducks's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,086
Karma: 60358908
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Central Coast of California
Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manichean View Post
I think what he's trying to say is that if you overwrite your (assumedly broken) metadata.db with an older one, and in the meantime had changed some author names or titles, which Calibre would have mirrored in the folder structure, then the older, working metadata.db would point to nonexisting folders while, at the same time, you'd have nonreferenced folders in your library. Sorting out which is which might be decidedly non-trivial if you've changed a lot of things. Thus, making things even worse.
I notices browsing the Metadata.DB contents (yes I peeked ), that Authors also get a non-reused (renaming an author gets a new number) index number.
If Calibre were to use this number, similar to that used for numbering title file names, finding "orphans" should now become a rather trivial (Not in list) operation
theducks is online now   Reply With Quote