View Single Post
Old 09-21-2010, 07:28 AM   #136
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
I'm not sure about this. By this definition i would be considered an agnostic, yet i do not believe in a deity. Just because it is unlikely to be proved one way or another does not mean you can't attribute likelyhoods to things happening.
My take on this is that if you're attributing likelihoods then you are going down the road of reason and argument. In other words, your position would be, as mine, weak atheist.

An agnostic would say that attributing likelihoods wasn't relevant as the absolute solution was unknowable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merriam-Webster
Greek agnōstos unknown, unknowable, from a- + gnōstos known, from gignōskein to know.
However, whether people call themselves agnostics or atheists does depend on social circumstance; I agree! It took me a long time to summon the courage to call myself atheist.

Graham

Last edited by Graham; 09-21-2010 at 07:33 AM. Reason: replaced 'your' with 'you're'.
Graham is offline