View Single Post
Old 09-21-2010, 06:22 AM   #135
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by EowynCarter View Post
Don't mean anything. Look at flash, work ok with windows, use it on mac, or linux, it get slower.

On that point I second apple, go for the standard ! Not the proprietary crap.
Here's another take on the same story:

http://www.blackcj.com/blog/2010/09/...obile-devices/

What's interesting is that Flash and HTML5 were being compared side by side on the same Android device, so the effects of the implementation on different OSes aren't relevant (although the situation could differ on a different platform, of course).

Quote:
Let’s not forget to mention that HTML5 consumed TWICE the battery life as Flash for these tests on the Android.
If so, that weakens the argument against Flash as a battery hog.

It would be interesting to see similar tests on other platforms.

Here's a good attempt at a benchmark for both:

http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/

The main article was comparing with Flash 10.0. The comments below update the figures for the faster Flash 10.1.

Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote