Thread: PRS-900 Would the PRS-950 be appropriate for me?
View Single Post
Old 09-20-2010, 01:02 PM   #12
perost
Enthusiast
perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.perost ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 32
Karma: 406634
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sweden
Device: PRS-900
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackinca View Post
2 inches taller and wider than the 900. Please refer to the stats on the Sony site. Type in "PRS 950" and you will get the dimensions. By the way it is apprx. 2 and 1/4 inches thick. The weight is in error. Sony surely meant 1.23 lbs not ounces.
This is the official PRS 950 page, and they haven't put up any specifications there. It would be nice if you could provide a link to these specifications, since I'm unable to find them anywhere on any of Sonys pages.

But surely you must realize that these specifications must be wrong? A reader that is 2 and 1/4 inches thick and that weighs 1.23 lbs is so ridiculous that I can't understand why you continue to spread this information around. Just looking at the pictures on Sonys page immediately shows that this must be completely wrong. It is probably the size and weight of the whole package, as someone suggested in another thread.
perost is offline   Reply With Quote