View Single Post
Old 09-20-2010, 10:40 AM   #179
Lady Fitzgerald
Wizard
Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Lady Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,013
Karma: 251649
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tempe, AZ, USA, Earth
Device: JetBook Lite (away from home) + 1 spare, 32" TV (at home)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Lake View Post
...Now if they'd come right out and said, "Yes, we fired him because of reason X, Y, and Z" (assuming doing so is legal), then I might have said something different. But to fire someone in cold blood, and then call it "retirement" is just screaming of unethical dishonestly to the n'th degree...
Most companies, to avoid risk of lawsuit, will merely report that a former employee did work for them and not give a reason for termination, no matter if the former bemplyee had a glowing work record or was fired. People are quick to read through obfuscating euphemisms such as, "...has left to seek employment opportunities elsewhere," etc. The proper protocol here would have been to have simply said that Robert is no longer involved in support and Jenifer is taking his place.

Last edited by Lady Fitzgerald; 09-20-2010 at 10:42 AM.
Lady Fitzgerald is offline   Reply With Quote