Quote:
Originally Posted by jswinden
Would you say then that the thickness of cover sides is thinner than the cover for the 300? I really liked the 300 cover as it was fairly thick and robust.
|
No, it looks to be virtually the same, what I meant was that since the PRS-350 is already thinner than the PRS-300, the added thickness from the 350 covers about makes it slightly thicker than the 300 w/o it.
However as I mentioned, I like the new one a lot more since the front cover easily folds back w/o moving the back cover. Hard to explain from someone who's not using English as a first language but when you get to see it, you'll know what I mean
