Thread: SciFi history?
View Single Post
Old 09-18-2010, 12:05 AM   #276
starrigger
Jeffrey A. Carver
starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
starrigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,355
Karma: 1107383
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Device: Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, Droid phone, Nook HD+
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcCunney View Post
I believe the technical term for that usage is "As you know, Bob...", and applied to the sort of expository blobs intended to convey background to the reader.

SF writers may succeed or fail based on how deftly they handle it.
______
Dennis

The technical term that my friends and I use for it is AWAKing: "As we all know..." Except it's not really expository blobs; it's dialogue serving the function of exposition.

I listened to a radio play of the Foundation trilogy, and there's a conversation that actually starts with those words. <wince>

It's the mark of a good writer to be able to accomplish the purpose of an AWAK without actually doing it. Or, as Dennis says, by doing it so deftly the reader doesn't notice, or mind. In most cases, smart exposition is a better choice. Weaving it into the thread is the best choice.

Last edited by starrigger; 09-18-2010 at 12:09 AM.
starrigger is offline   Reply With Quote