View Single Post
Old 09-15-2010, 01:24 PM   #87
Joebill
Fanatic
Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Joebill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Joebill's Avatar
 
Posts: 517
Karma: 459442
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alpha Centauri's Library of Alexandria
Device: Pandigital Novel
One book I read on becoming an author said to not mention Star Trek if you wanted to write more serious stories.

Relatives have asked me about the science in Trek. I point out that it appears they write the story/episode and then ask the sceince people about it.

One thing that irritated me is that show uses time travelled to the destination as a plot device, the distance isn't covered in the same amount of time with the same type of ship, i.e. no internal consistency.

That 'internal consistency' is what I use to accept or not accept various propulsion methods or devices a SF story uses. If the author comes up with a reasonable explnation of why it works, and sticks to it, I'll accept FTL ships in a story.

i.e. I'll accept Dylithium crystals before I'll accept 'well, it just does'.
Joebill is offline   Reply With Quote