View Single Post
Old 09-08-2010, 11:35 AM   #236
Piper_
~~~~~
Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Piper_'s Avatar
 
Posts: 761
Karma: 1278391
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Device: Kindle 3, Sony 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald View Post
Again with the legal semantics argument. Sigh!
Is it semantics? Yes.

Is it a distinction without a difference? No.

It's a distinction that was the subject of a US Supreme Court case. I don't think their findings should be discarded by anyone who claims that what the Poll proposes is equivalent to stealing a TV set.

The reason I posted the Wiki entry instead of the link to the case itself was to show how easy it is for anyone to find proof that no one deserves to have their motives and characters maligned for drawing the same important distinction the court did.

And it's not a new concept. It's also easy to find that Thomas Jefferson drew the same distinction.

Last edited by Piper_; 09-08-2010 at 11:38 AM.
Piper_ is offline   Reply With Quote