View Single Post
Old 09-06-2010, 11:00 AM   #35
TGS
Country Member
TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
TGS's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,058
Karma: 7676767
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Denmark
Device: Liseuse: Irex DR800. PRS 505 in the house, and the missus has an iPad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate the great View Post
Wouldn't state capitalism be best defined as capitalism for the benefit of the state? That's not what the UK were trying to accomplish.
I don't think so - capitalist relations of production are those in which the surplus value of the labour of those who do the producing is extracted -the only difference between state capitalism and corporate capitalism is that the ownership and control of the means of production are in the hands of the state rather than in the hands of corporate capital. In neither case do those who produce have ownership and control of the means of production. As I said, the UK never got beyond nationalising a few industries, and in that sense was only ever a mixed economy - a mix of state and corporate capitalism.
TGS is offline   Reply With Quote