View Single Post
Old 09-04-2010, 07:13 PM   #47
Lady Fitzgerald
Wizard
Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Lady Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,013
Karma: 251649
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tempe, AZ, USA, Earth
Device: JetBook Lite (away from home) + 1 spare, 32" TV (at home)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcCunney View Post
It actually went vinyl->CD. Cassette was an alternate format to vinyl, not a replacement, and provided a means to have music in a portable format.

I knew lots of folks with LPs and turntable to play them. Many also had cassette players. I can't think of any offhand who only had cassette players, or replaced vinyl with cassettes. (I still have a turntable, and a lot of vinyl.)


Sure, And people migrated because they thought it offered value (like getting a cassette player to complement the turntable and have portable music), or because they thought they had to (like conversion from vinyl to CD). MP3 players bear the same relation to CDs that cassettes do to vinyl - they're portable.

We are nowhere near the point in the evolution of ebooks where people will migrate because they think they have to, as paper books are going away. So the question is what additional value an ereader and electronic books offers over paper. Portability is one potential source of value, but may not be sufficient by itself.


If you have the MP3s, you can burn your own CD if you want to.

You get the physical CD, I think, largely because everything may not be available as MP3s. iTunes encourages checking picking - getting only a few popular songs to load on your iPod - and has raised the bar for bands because it's much more important to make the album especially strong to make it worth having. It's almost a reversion to the period before the 60's, when what most kids bought were singles, and albums were things others bought for you as gifts. Albums had the singles, and filler of varying quality.

As FM radio became dominant, playlists expanded, and more bands wrote and recorded their own music, the LP became the focus, and people bought albums, not singles. There was more pressure to create albums that had more to offer than a hit single or two.

The rise of the MP3 and the emergence of iTunes has reestablished the importance of the individual song, and if you can get just the few songs you want, why buy the album?
______
Dennis
Amazon also sells individual tracks on most albums.
Lady Fitzgerald is offline   Reply With Quote