View Single Post
Old 09-04-2010, 07:18 AM   #23
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,133
Karma: 315558334
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldpilot View Post
A great discussion; I'm glad I found it.

I have regularly used hanging/negative indentation for bibliographies. I use .3in indent and hanging indent.

Are you aware of Amazon's guide to the Kindle?

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/image...Guidelines.pdf
Oh yes. Note on Page 7 the item about paragraph formatting doesn't say that if you use negative indents with ems then they won't work on Kindle for Mac or Kindle for PC.

It also has nothing to say about font sizes.

Amazon's Kindle formatting guidelines are quite poor in terms of precise detail. If you just want paragraphs of plain text they're fine.

I think it's the inconsistency between the different Kindle platforms that upsets me most.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote