View Single Post
Old 09-03-2010, 11:18 AM   #27
emalvick
Groupie
emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!emalvick , Klaatu Barada Niktu!
 
Posts: 166
Karma: 5358
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Device: Kindle 3
Actually, I think that hiding the SSID can be legitimate. I live in a college town where most of my neighbors are college students and a few of them are students who do anything they can to get a free internet connection. When I was first in the neighborhood and broadcasting my SSID with WEP (before WPA2 was available), I could see through my firewall that someone was continually trying to get into my network probably just as they were trying to get through a few of the other nearby networks broadcasting their SSID.

I do think they got through once, but once I hid the SSID, they did quit trying. While I know that they could have kept trying, there were enough other networks for them to try, which was more of a deterrent than just hiding my network was, but it was good for something.

Later I ended up with WPA2 and started broadcasting my SSID again (for my own ease), and the attempts to get in kept up. I also added MAC address filtering just because it made me more comfortable, but the attempts kept coming. I now go back to hiding the SSID and broadcasting it when I get a new device to connect but leave it off otherwise.

The reality is that while it may not do a lot for security, if a potential freeloader (which is what I deal with) is trying to find a network, it helps if they don't know it's there, especially when there are other wireless networks around.
emalvick is offline   Reply With Quote