Quote:
Originally Posted by OrcaBlue
This is not the case of overreaching "political correctness". So please don't use that as a defend.
|
No, it seems to be more like a case of overreaching editing of someone's quote.

The very thing I took issue with -- quoting me out of context -- is exactly what you just did, and did... and did.
The rest of my quote follows:
Quote:
Originally Posted by EatingPie
No, I had said I think it's okay because it's in use in a circle of friends. That's PC for yah. We can't even discuss and debate, because we have to be misquoted and labeled racist or ignorant. And, even worse, I love my friends -- and their people/culture -- but me calling them "Indians" made me a "racist."
|
In my accusation about Political Correctness, you don't think it's relevant that I'm quoting terms already used in this thread? Or that in my example, I was explaining how I was (I believe) deliberately misquoted/misrepresented in order to brand me a racist? You also don't think it relevant evidence that I was branded a racist solely due to the use of term, and not at all the state of my heart, or the way I viewed this particular culture (explicitly stated, with "love")?
It is this sole reliance on use of terminology deemed "insensitive" -- rather than looking at a person's heart/intent/motive -- that I define as "Political Correctness."
So, yes, using "PC" as a "defend" is legitimate in this case. But only when you make sure to quote me in context.
Let us take another example.
Quote:
This is about how one should be more sensitive when using language that might offend others in a public forum, especially in forum such as Mobileread. It doesn't mean much when you were never a target of the derogatory label and discriminated against.
|
First, you assume I've never been the target of a derogatory label. False in almost all ways possible. Second you assume I've never been discriminated against. Also false.
I might find such assumptions quite offensive (I have thick skin, actually). Or maybe others would. If this were the case, should you not be more sensitive in a public forum when using language to suggest I've never heard a racial epitaph directed at me, or been treated badly just because of skin color/social standing/way I speak/etc.?
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by EatingPie
I think a sold watching of the film Gran Torino is in order. A guy who cares (fatherly love) about people he calls "gook," "zipperhead," "nip."
|
Let me guess Hollywood films are now considered reality.
|
Ah, once again, total out of context quoting. When the sentence that immediately follows was the imperative:
"What do you do with that? Is he a racist? It's a damn good question, but one that's about as un-PC as it gets (but, ironically, about loving/caring about people)." Apparently, I hit the nail on the head here.
I started my previous post with the complaint about being misquoted and mis-represented illustrating one way I've seen a sort of "PC agenda" work. And the first reply to my post claims I cannot use "PC as a defend," and bolsters this argument by misquoting (out of context quotes, anyway) and misrepresenting my words!
I would say the irony is pretty thick there.
-Pie