[Lady Fitzgerald]

For me, this is pretty much a dead horse but didn't comment on that since it still is a hot topic for others. I voted Still too many variables primarily because ambient light was not included as a standard and, at least to me, that makes a huge difference. Also, no distinction was made between relective LCDs and backlit ones. And, among backlit LCDs, some may have the brightness adjustable and others may not, another variable that can have a huge impact. Yet another problem is the standards put forth are rarely what happens in reality. Trying to compare LCDs to e-ink screens is very subjective due to differences in users, devices and viewing conditions. Each person has to make their own decisions as to what works best for them.

My idea of an ideal reader display would be either a high contrast e-ink screen with a variable backlight and long battery life or a reflective LCD with the same specifications: high contrast with a variable backlight and long battery life. Until then, I will have to settle for the best compromise of comfortable viewing, durability, ease of use, battery life, firmware, format compatability, price, etc., for me and my needs.