View Single Post
Old 08-27-2010, 09:55 AM   #96
bill_mchale
Wizard
bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Thornton View Post
My point was that stealing a container, and obtaining an illegal copy of the content, are not the same. I don't think that either the law, or morality has caught up with the shift to digital media, but clearly there is
a difference between taking a container with content in it, and taking a copy of the content only.
Two thoughts with respect to this.

1. Morality (as opposed to ethics), is not something I accept as a changeable thing. Something is either moral or it isn't.

2. The distinction between container and content, with regards to books, is a false one. Ultimately, it is the contents, not the container, that make the book valuable.

I agree that the law has not caught up with the digital age, but I think anyone who is expecting copyright to be essentially waived with respect to the darknet is probably sadly mistaken.

--
Bill
bill_mchale is offline   Reply With Quote