View Single Post
Old 08-25-2010, 04:04 PM   #56
delphidb96
Wizard
delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,999
Karma: 300001
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Citrus Heights, California
Device: TWO Kindle 2s, one each Bookeen Cybook Gen3, Sony PRS-500, Axim X51V
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyrath View Post
Yes, Star Trek's Mr. Spock asked the question: "Does the good of the many out-weigh the good of the few (or the one)?"

Some say that the one-dimensional "conservative-liberal" model is a bit limited, and a two-dimensional model makes things more clear:
http://www.projectrho.com/rocket/rocket3ac.html#axis
The good of the few, or especially the one, *always* outweighs the good of the many. That does NOT preclude the option of the one, or few, from choosing to put the good of the many first in any given situation, just that it is natural and proper to put one's own needs/survival first. (Yes, nature also hardwires a priority to put one's own childrens' needs before oneself - but that can be overridden, and it may be proper to do so in some rare situations.)

Derek
delphidb96 is offline   Reply With Quote