Quote:
Originally Posted by Sydney's Mom
I don't consider someone who reads less than a book a month a reader. That would be like calling someone who has less than a drink a month a drinker. Seems to me it has to be more of a habit than that.
|
In days gone by, a lot of monks might have read less than one book a month, but they all had habits. Is someone who has less than one philand a month not a philanderer?
These stats seemed to suggest much less than 50% would fit your "reader" definition, but where in the 1%-50% we get to 12 per annum is not clear.
Perhaps the main point is that we are the elite
Be afraid.