Wow, that Realclimate.org blog is something.
Here's a piece that says that the 9 so-called factual errors pointed out by the British judge were not errors at all.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...ient-untruths/
They conclude:
Quote:
|
Overall, our verdict is that the 9 points are not "errors" at all (with possibly one unwise choice of tense on the island evacuation point). But behind each of these issues lies some fascinating, and in some cases worrying, scientific findings and we can only applaud the prospect that more classroom discussions of these subjects may occur because of this court case.
|