Thread: Seriousness The concept of 'TIME'
View Single Post
Old 08-23-2010, 02:16 PM   #64
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsvick View Post
I think the best example are the pilots of some of the jets, like the SR-71, the Concorde, and others. Again, the difference is very, very small, but I bet measurable.
Certainly; it's been measured. A few years ago someone took two atomic clocks and precisely synchronised them. One of them then "stayed at home", while the other was flown around the world in commercial airliners. When it came back, the clock that had been on its travels was a few nanoseconds behind the one that had stayed in the laboratory, even though they were still measuring time at precisely the same rate. The amount of time lost by the travelling clock was precisely in according with what relativity predicted.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote