View Single Post
Old 10-16-2007, 12:13 PM   #37
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
One of my friends is an expert in atmospheric physics, and he tells me that all the big computer models which have been developed to do long term modelling of the behaviour of the Earth's atmosphere show long-term warming trends. The only way in which the different models differ is how much warming there will be over the next century. Even a rise of a few degrees C could lead to radical spreads of desert areas, migration of huge numbers of people, war, etc.
My reservations about the present models is that the information is necessarily not complete, owing to the lack of complete historical records before a certain point. Plus the ones I've heard about (no direct knowledge here) seem to start their trends from the end of the last mini ice-age that was induced by (I think) Krakatoa's eruption, which seems to me might just skew things a bit, and I've yet to hear anyone claiming to have compensated for that -- but again, it's not my area at all.

I suppose if things get too warm, we could just get a really big volcanic eruption to settle them down.
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote