View Single Post
Old 08-22-2010, 03:42 AM   #509
FlorenceArt
High Priestess
FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FlorenceArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
FlorenceArt's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,761
Karma: 5042529
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Montreuil sous bois, France
Device: iPad Pro 9.7, iPhone 6 Plus
My understanding, from vaguely remembered school lessons, is that some conservatives tried to use Darwin as a theoretical justification for social hierarchies, and for not helping the poor and letting "natural selection" pick the best. And, in some cases, even went as far as proposing eugenic actions, such as rendering some people sterile (the poor or the handicapped) to prevent them from "polluting" the gene pool. Since these have since gained a bad reputation by being associated with the Nazis, it has given Darwin a bad name, for reasons that had nothing to do with him, or of course the validity of his theory.

Which bad reputation is now being re-used by ultra-conservatives to shed doubts on said theory. Ironic, isn't it?
FlorenceArt is offline   Reply With Quote