Quote:
Originally Posted by Ea
Yep. They do that a lot; throw in suggestions here and there, or create a connection in the mind of the reader, like this, underscore mine:
Michelle was employed at the law firm Sidley Austin along with Weather Underground terrorist Bernardine Dohrn, where she met Barack Obama.
|
They are also good at imitating the language of serious science, to show how open-minded they are. As in this example on the Dinosaur article:
Quote:
|
The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, a second century BC piece of art, contains a portion which depicts a group of Ethiopians hunting what some claim appears to be a dinosaur; there is much debate on this, however, and most modern art historians consider the mysterious animal to be a lion or a crocodile (the latter theory is supported by the presence of the Greek word for "crocodile" written near the image of the mysterious animal).
|
Let's see, if you see a painting of an animal that vaguely resembles a crocodile, and the word "crocodile" is written near it, I'd say it's worth considering the notion that it might be a crocodile.
