Quote:
Originally Posted by WT Sharpe
You can't make this stuff up. There is a relatively new conservative alternative to Wikipedia called Conservapedia that bills itself as "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia." The following excerpt is from that source. For the record, I don't believe there's a scientist alive who believes that Einstein's General Theory of Relativity is the final word on the way the universe works or that it is a complete theory. It's incompatibility with Quantum Mechanics is hardly a secret, as thousands of books and courses on the subjects of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics make clear; but the idea that General Relativity is a liberal conspiracy is unique to a special mindset.
<><><>
.....The theory of relativity is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions. It is heavily promoted by liberals who like its encouragement of relativism and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world.[1] Here is a list of 28 counterexamples: any one of them shows that the theory is incorrect.
........ 9. The action-at-a-distance by Jesus, described in John 4:46-54.
..........— From the Conservapedia article, " Counterexamples to Relativity." The FOOTNOTE referenced above reads: "[1] See, e.g., historian Paul Johnson's book about the 20th century, and the article written by liberal law professor Laurence Tribe as allegedly assisted by Barack Obama. Virtually no one who is taught and believes relativity continues to read the Bible, a book that outsells New York Times bestsellers by a hundred-fold."
<><><>
For more on the subject, see the recent article at NewScientist.com entitled " E=mc2? Not on Conservapedia" by Amanda Gefter and Celeste Biever.
|
Hmm... I don't know much about the Bible, but I seem to remember that Jesus walked on water. Does it mean Archimedes and Newton were both members of The Great Liberal Conspiracy?
