View Single Post
Old 08-14-2010, 02:03 PM   #5978
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by recluse View Post
I think Margaret Atwood is a fine writer.

It's the term 'Literary' that bothers me.
It's like a warning sticker: "This book is a pretentious, trendy waste of paper"
She's a wonderful writer.

But there are other factors involved. Margaret is Canadian. The Canadian market isn't large enough to support someone writing fiction just from local sales. So the Canadian government offers grants to support indigenous writers. If you're a Canadian writer, your goal is to qualify for the highest level of grant you can, which can influence what you write and how you present it.

Atwood is one of the exceptions that has been picked up and become popular outside of Canada, but she still comes from and writes within the Canadian system. I'd have to do research to confirm it, but I suspect her "What I write isn't SF" claims have more to do with how the Canadian grants system classifies things than her own feelings about the genre.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote