Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin R
The original poster believes that they 'have a case' and should be encouraged to peruse any avenue available if they believe they are wronged. The fact that one party, or a group of people, believes that their time is wasted is no reason to not peruse an issue. Within any legal system or regulatory body, both parties believe that they are right and the other is wrong etc. With the logic above, taken to the extreme, all complaints should be dismissed everywhere.
|
Are you suggesting that anyone who thinks that they have a case should pursue it? That one should never disagree with them if it seems plain to you that they don't have a case at all?
That strikes me as an odd position. I wasn't saying that people shouldn't pursue a case if
anyone disagrees with them. I was saying that there isn't a case against Amazon for insisting that you register a credit card before they will deal with you. They don't accept PayPal either. Nor can I barter with them using chickens.
My point is that, in this case, I don't think that there is a case
