View Single Post
Old 08-08-2010, 02:44 PM   #100
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
People are welcome to form a fake Latin plural of "virus" if they wish - I just wondered where that extra "i" came from.

"Opera" is itself a plural - it's the plural of "opus" ("work", in the sense of an artistic work)

I don't object in the slightest to English plurals. Once a word is used in English, it is an English word, and can legitimately be given an English plural. Thus, "viruses", "focuses", "appendixes", and so on, are all absolutely fine.

What I think is a little bit silly is to "make" up Latin plurals - and even worse, to get them wrong .

I had a rant about Italian plurals in another thread recently. "Paninis" is one that's often seen - people genuinely don't seem to be aware that "panini" is a plural.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote