Thread: NYT Kindle obit
View Single Post
Old 08-08-2010, 11:22 AM   #26
Logseman
Orisa
Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Logseman ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Logseman's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,001
Karma: 1035571
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ireland
Device: Onyx Poke 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Because they don't believe in doing their competition's market research for them.

To paraphrase: why are the "friggin" numbers so important?

Amazon has achieved one important thing: they've made ebooks mainstream.
There's no going back on that. The rest...? (shrug)

Why should we care what one big corporation does to another?
Do they offer an acceptable product at an acceptable price?
Do they support it and sustain it?
Then, who cares if they sell 3 million or 5 million?

Really, what difference does it make to *us*?
As a standard procedure, I mistrust secretive companies. In a world where value is subjective, and it is bound to the perceptions of people, such secrecy can bring a company from hero to zero in no time. Secrecy is the mother of deception, and deception is the sister of theft.
Logseman is offline   Reply With Quote