View Single Post
Old 10-09-2007, 02:26 PM   #140
wgrimm
Addict
wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 230
Karma: 334908
Join Date: Oct 2006
Device: multiple
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
MS-DOS before All that was in 1981. Windows 3.1 wasn't released for another 11 years, in 1992. By that time, MS-DOS already "ruled the world" and was shipped with basically every computer sold.

.
Sorry, but I have to disagree with this. There were alternatives, good alternatives, at least in the 1980s. M$ certainly did not "rule the world." OS/2 was an option, as was DR-DOS. Concurrent DOS ran very nicely, as did Coherent. In the GUI market, PC-GEOS was probably a better GUI than MS-Windows (M$ didn't play fair here, and PC-GEOS now is the Nokia GUI, I believe).

I think it was in 1989 that I bought a couple of Dell's with Dell UNIX pre-installed, so at that time M$ hadn't coerced all of the manufacturers to buy into their OSs.

The nice thing today is that there are great alternatives to M$. And more and more people are switching to them. I have to work with M$ software, but honestly- if I was forced to use their OSs for my personal computing, I would not own a computer.
wgrimm is offline   Reply With Quote