View Single Post
Old 08-07-2010, 03:57 AM   #45
Elfwreck
Grand Sorcerer
Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Elfwreck's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,187
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaxx6166 View Post
Looks like there are some others who feel strongly that self published authors should at least polish their works.
I don't mind if they don't polish their works... I just want to know what I'm getting into. I'd be more dismayed by an excellent description written by a friend who does professional book editing attached to a book that obviously hadn't even been spellchecked, than the current mix of bad descriptions, awful cover art, and equally poor writing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by banjobama View Post
Maybe we should start a blog for reviews.

I have my own, but it would be nice to have one that many people had posting privileges at so it would stay fresh. Would anyone be interested in doing this?
Sounds like fun. Could be done here in the recs folder with some tags, or at a separate blog. (I like here for purely selfish reasons--my job blocks access to most blog sites.)

I wouldn't want to limit reviews to "books by authors who self-promote at MR;" I'd like to be able to hype the gems I've found through other methods, and warn people about the dreck.

And as much as I'd be concerned about hurting authors' feelings--reviews are for readers. They're supposed to let other people know if they'd like to read the book. How well- or poorly-written the book is isn't the point of a review, and authors & reviewers alike should treat that as just one aspect of the book. A person who's obsessed with space alien-vampire BDSM love stories may not care about atrocious grammar; the genre's so tiny they may love to find *anything* in it. A civil war recreationist may like historical fiction set in 1860--but only if the details are correct; excellent storytelling skills may take second place to accuracy. And so on.

Quote:
If we had 10 or more people contributing, each person would not have to do much at all. Each reviewer could maybe choose a favorite genre
Ooh, I like that! With maybe some space for crossover; while most of my reading runs through a few genres, I wouldn't want to be shut out of reviewing the odd book that fell outside of them, especially if it's by an author I know from other books.

Maybe themed days of the week? Sunday science fiction; Monday mysteries; Tuesday (torrid) romances; Wednesday wild card...
Elfwreck is offline   Reply With Quote