Quote:
Originally Posted by banjobama
Right. There are about five million blogs already in existence for book reviews. Maybe the difference would be everything requested HAS to be reviewed, even if it's bad (that's how I do mine, but for the most part I haven't read anything bad). People can also comment if they agree or disagree.
|
Comments from other contributors on the same book would be a really nifty feature (along with reader comments perhaps?)
Quote:
If we had 10 or more people contributing, each person would not have to do much at all. Each reviewer could maybe choose a favorite genre, so that a die-hard science fiction fan won't have to try and objectively review a historical romance, something with which he or she has no experience.
|
That would be a real strength -- there are huge parts of the book universe I couldn't objectively review books in because the entire genre leaves me cold.
Quote:
The more I think about it, the more fun this sounds to do.
|
Agreed.