View Single Post
Old 09-29-2007, 12:08 PM   #97
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Sorry, my highlighting again, but isn't using such a tool "engaging in an act of circumvention of a technical protection"? If not, what does that phrase mean? I would interpret (a)(1) to mean that it's illegal to use such a tool, and (a)(2) to mean that it's illegal to develop or distribute them.
According to the EFF's interpretation (and they ARE lawyers there), use is not illegal. Only distribution of tools.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote