View Single Post
Old 07-14-2010, 04:42 PM   #873
beppe
Grand Sorcerer
beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 5,161
Karma: 81026524
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Device: Kindle3, Ipod4, IPad2
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGS View Post
So the question is should we speak of that which we cannot know with more, or with less, precision
We should always speak with the maximum precision.
On this, mathematicians are masters. For them, the maximum is to speak (write actually) with such concise precision that only 3 or 4 people can understand what they say.

It all comes down from the ancient secret society of the Pythagoreans.

By the other hand one of my teachers used to say. There is no point in trying to be rigorous with your mathematical style, because there will always be at least one that thinks and says aloud that your sloppy!

I came to the conclusion that one should know as much mathematics as possible and then forget about it.

Last edited by beppe; 07-14-2010 at 04:57 PM.
beppe is offline   Reply With Quote