View Single Post
Old 07-13-2010, 11:49 PM   #853
nguirado
Wizard
nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nguirado ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,262
Karma: 1499080
Join Date: May 2010
Device: Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimMason View Post
The Guardian is hosting a series on "whether science can describe everything." Here's Sue Blakemore's opening shot. Note Steve Fuller's response, a few comments below the line. (Steve Fuller is a rather notorious sociologist of science).
It can describe, potentially, everything physical. If everything is physical, then it can potentially describe everything including why I'm posting this now.

If not, then no.

If you saw me flout a rule you feel strongly about, say clubbing a baby seal, you wouldn't get angry?
nguirado is offline   Reply With Quote