|
There being no point in attempting debate with those using the tactics you two are
displaying here, I will just set the record straight and ignore the rest of your fained
outrage. I doubt that you are really that thin skinned and are just using the victim
card, as a tactic.
On LSD battery utility in the JBL:
The results I was referring to are not based on a comparison with any LSD batteries,
"real" or not. They result from the fact that the regular (non-LSD batteries) have
"shelf times" that exceed the operational needs for my regular reading pattern. If the
"regular" batteries can give me 24 days after charging and provide full power to the JBL,
then last the number of hours of use shown in the results, Then any special Low Self
Discharge (LSD) capabilities your special batteries may have will never come into play.
If I were to regularly have sets of batteries that have gone two months or more on the
shelf after charging, like the Lady Fitzgerald described, then an interest in LSD batteries
would make some sense, but that is a very unlikely scenario for a JBL user.
----------
Yes, electrical and electronic properties remain the same, but battery performance can
vary - isn't that your contention, that your favorite battery functions better than all
others? This will apparently come as a shock, but lab test results don't always match
the results in the field. "Your mileage may vary" applies to many things in real life.
I find it worthwhile to make purchase decisions based on real world practical results
as relate as closely as possible to the actual environment the items will be used in.
Even you should see how the testing in this thread attempts to come close to that
objective, and that it directly relates to the question posed by this thread. Your
links to general battery performance testing results, do not actually address the
question.
Ken
|