View Single Post
Old 07-13-2010, 12:20 AM   #50
ardeegee
Maratus speciosus butt
ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ardeegee's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by kindlekitten View Post
regardless of the topic, PMs are PRIVATE MESSAGES. if you need clarification, ask a friend, don't post it. this is a bannable offense at many websites. not sure why you had to include the PM issue. you could have just said; "had a conversation with someone and brought up this poster... what do you think?"

major jerk points dude
At no point did I quote any PMs and at no point did I say who I was PMing with-- and I would not have done so. Look at my posts-- I went out of my way to avoid naming names. There was no breach of privacy whatsoever. That he chose to reveal himself was his choice.

I reject your jerk points categorically.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SameOldStory View Post
So, did you apologize?

...

happy_terd is right.

...

If you repeatedly asked me to explain why I found it (what I thought of as near pedophilia, or thought was actually pedophilia) was wrong I might be upset and terse also.

...

Whether or not it was porn or fine oriental film making doesn't really matter to him. After one or, at most, two replies back from him you should have respected his beliefs as being other than yours and left him alone.
1.) I actually did apologize to him for sounding rude (but I believe I sounded rude again before saying we were best off to drop the PMing) but I did not and absolutely will not ever apologize for the link itself.

2.) happy_terd is NOT right-- happy_terd says that only because we loathe each other. Why would someone be offended just by the fact that someone sent a PM to them-- a PM with only one purpose-- to attempt to help that person with a problem that they had brought up in the forum? (He asked for ways to help learn Japanese-- I sent a link to ways that could help in learning.) If someone doesn't want PMs at all, then I would assume that they would have PMs disabled altogether.

3.) I have no intention of getting into exact specifics of the PM contents, but I did stop after around 3 posts. There was no "repeatedly"-- that's an invention of happy_terd's assumptions.
ardeegee is offline